Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near BN20 7LT

Longwood, 1 Fairfield Road, Eastbourne, East Sussex, BN20 7LT

HAV/21UC/LDC/2024/0606 · dispensation from consultation · Eastbourne · decided 17 Dec 2024

The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for asbestos removal in the basement and installation of emergency lighting and fire alarm works, on condition that the decision is sent to all leaseholders within 28 days.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordLongwood (Eastbourne) Management Company Ltd
Management companyLongwood (Eastbourne) Management Company Ltd
Managing agentOakfield P.M Limited
BuildingA block, 5 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputeinsurance, repairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
which has been converted into 5 flats
freeholder
Applicant : [name] (Eastbourne) Management
agent
Representative : Oakfield P.M Limited
outcome
Dispensation is requested for all consultation requirements as
s20
we are satisfied that dispensation should be granted and is granted for the

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.