London Park House, 146-158 Park Street, Luton, LU1 3EY
CAM/00KA/LAC/2025/0004 · administration charges · Luton · decided 23 Jul 2025
The tribunal found that administration charges for late payment of 2024 ground rent on two flats were not payable because the leaseholders did not receive the ground rent demands.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Tuscola (109) Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Grangeford Asset Management Limited |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2024 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : [name] (109) Limited
- agent
Representative : Grangeford Asset Management Limited
- years
the administration charges for late payment of ground rent for the year 2024 for flats F11 and F45 are not payable
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the administration charges for late payment of ground rent for the year 2024 for flats F11 and F45 are not payable.
- items reduced
The Tribunal determines that the administration charges for late payment of ground rent for the year 2024 for flats F11 and F45 are not payable.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.