Lloyd Court, London SE27 0BX
LON/00AY/LDC/2021/0314 · dispensation from consultation · Lambeth · decided 30 Jun 2022
The tribunal granted the landlord unconditional dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for capital works to the lateral mains and lighting at Lloyd Court, because the leaseholder of Flat 4 was not shown to have suffered any prejudice from the failure to serve the section 20 notice at his correspondence address.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 14 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property is a 4-storey purpose-built block of 14 flats.
- outcome
The tribunal dispenses unconditionally with those of the consultation requirements which were not complied with in respect of the qualifying works
- s20
we grant unconditional dispensation from compliance with the consultation requirements.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.