Leybourne Park, 29-32 Eaton Place, Larkfield, Aylesford, ME20 7GF
HAV/29UP/LDC/2025/0660 · dispensation from consultation · Tonbridge and Malling · decided 21 Oct 2025
The Tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent emergency repairs to loose ridge tiles at 29-32 Eaton Place, but made no decision on whether the works cost of £6,572.51 is reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Sanhall GR Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 114 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £6,572.51 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : Sanhall GR Limited
- outcome
I therefore grant dispensation from the consultation requirements under s.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
- total demanded
The total sum of the works was £6,572.51 including VAT.
- s20
I therefore grant dispensation from the consultation requirements under s.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.