Leigh House, 13 Westby Road, Bournemouth, Dorset BH5 1HA
CHI/00HN/LDC/2019/0062 · dispensation from consultation · Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole · decided 3 Oct 2019
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent repairs to the supports of the overhanging roof at Leigh House, without deciding whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Napier Management Services Limited |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- agent
Representative : Napier Management Services Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of S.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 for repairs to the supports to the overhanging roof.
- s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of S.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 for repairs to the supports to the overhanging roof.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.