Lantern Court, 106, Hall Lane, Baguley, Manchester M23 1DJ
MAN/00BN/LDC/2021/0032 · dispensation from consultation · Manchester · decided 2 Dec 2021
The tribunal granted the management company dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent fire alarm and ventilation works required after a fire authority enforcement notice, while leaseholders keep their right to challenge the costs later.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Scanlans Property Management LLP |
| Management company | Lantern Court (Baguley) Management Company Limited |
| Managing agent | Scanlans Property Management LLP |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- management company
[name] Court (Baguley) Management
- agent
Applicant’s representative : Scanlans Property Management LLP
- outcome
The dispensation sought by the Applicant from compliance with Section 20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 is granted
- s20
The dispensation sought by the Applicant from compliance with Section 20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 is granted
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.