Lansdowne Manor, 55 Lansdowne Road, Bournemouth, Dorset, BH1 1RN
CHI/00HN/LCP/2022/0003 · LCP · Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole · decided 9 Jun 2023
The tribunal determined that the Respondent company must pay the Applicant £2,000.22 inclusive of VAT towards its costs of the abandoned right to manage claim under section 88 of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Assethold Limited |
| Management company | Managingbyeus Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | management fees, legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | £2,000.22 |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to pay the applicant's costs of acquiring the right to manage of £2,000.22 inclusive of VAT under s.88(4) |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- management company
Respondent : Managingbyeus Limited
- outcome
I determine that £2,000.22 (inclusive of VAT) is payable by the Respondent under s.88(4) of the 2002 Act.
- total payable
I determine that £2,000.22 (inclusive of VAT) is payable by the Respondent under s.88(4) of the 2002 Act.
- costs
I determine that £2,000.22 (inclusive of VAT) is payable by the Respondent under s.88(4) of the 2002 Act.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.