Kirkdale Corner, Westwood Hill, London, SE26 4NP
LON/00AZ/LSC/2023/0355 · service charges · Lewisham · decided 10 Jul 2024
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the sums charged for the 2020 internal redecoration works payable in full, because the applicants did not prove the landlord knew the works were pointless, and refused the applicants' applications for costs orders.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Daejan Investments Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : Daejan Investments Limited
- years
the sums charged to the Applicants in respect of the 2020 Works (as defined in paragraph 5 below) are payable in full.
- outcome
The sums charged to the Applicants in respect of the 2020 Works (as defined in paragraph 5 below) are payable in full.
- s20c
Both applications are therefore refused
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.