Kings Court, Lower Kings Road, Berkhamsted, HP4 2AS
CAM/26UC/LDC/2026/0029 · dispensation from consultation · Dacorum · decided 15 Jun 2026
The tribunal granted the management company retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent roof valley repairs, but made no finding on whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 10 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2024 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
being 10 flats split over two
- years
In late September 2024, water ingress was reported in Flat 7.
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the Applicant retrospective dispensation from the
- s20
The Tribunal grants the Applicant retrospective dispensation from the
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.