Kings Court, Kings Road, Lymington, Hampshire, SO41 9GS
CHI/24UJ/LAM/2020/0014 · appointment of a manager · New Forest · decided 26 Jan 2021
figures not yet checkedNo plain-English summary for this decision yet. See the original.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Dant Estates Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance, major works, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to repay the applicant's fees of £300 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property is a block of four flats, two on each of the ground floor and the first floor.
- freeholder
Respondent : Dant Estates Limited
- outcome
Mr [name] is appointed as Manager of the Property
- s20c
the Respondent consented to an order that costs not be added to the service charges pursuant to section 20C of the 1985 Act
- costs
The Respondent shall repay the £300 fees paid by the Applicant within 28 days.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.