Kelvin Court, 40-42 Kensington Park Road, London, W11 1BT
LON/00AW/LDC/2020/0086 · dispensation from consultation · Westminster · decided 5 May 2021
The tribunal granted the landlord unconditional dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for the replacement of the communal boilers at Kelvin Court because of the urgent legionella and fire risks.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Northumberland and Durham Property Trust Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 16 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Kelvin Court is an early 1900s brick construction block with 16 self-contained flats within a conservation area.
- freeholder
the landlord, Northumberland and Durham Property Trust Ltd (“ The Applicants”) seek dispensation
- outcome
The proper decision is that the Applicants should be given dispensation unconditionally.
- s20
The Applicants’ application is allowed. They are entitled to dispensation for the works proposed without any conditions applied.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.