Kelly Lodge, 7 Walpole Road, Bournemouth, Dorset, BH1 4HA
CHI/00HN/LIS/2018/0035 · LIS · Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole · decided 14 Dec 2018
The tribunal found the leaseholders liable to pay the full £17,748 charge for major brickwork repairs to Kelly Lodge for the 2018 service charge year, and found the amount reasonable and the section 20 consultation properly carried out.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Napier Management Services Ltd |
| Building | A block, 7 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2018 |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £17,748 |
| Total found payable | £17,748 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
was converted into seven flats on three floors
- agent
The Applicant is represented by its managing agents, Napier Management Services Ltd
- years
levied for the accounting year 2018
- outcome
that the sum so charged is reasonable
- total demanded
the sum of Seventeen Thousand [name] Hundred and Forty Eight Pounds (£17,748)
- total payable
the Respondents are liable to pay the sum of Seventeen Thousand [name] Hundred and Forty Eight Pounds (£17,748)
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.