Kedleston Close, Belper, Derbyshire, DE56 1TZ
BIR/17UB/LIS/2020/0008 · LIS · Amber Valley · decided 27 Jan 2021
The Tribunal struck out the RTM company's application because it had no jurisdiction under section 27A to decide whether rent charged for a House Manager's flat was payable to the freeholder, as this was a contractual dispute and the leaseholders were not parties.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Fairhold Homes (No 14) Limited |
| Management company | Heritage Court RTM Company Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 50 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2011, 2012, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
which is a block of 50 flats known as Heritage Court
- management company
Applicant : Heritage Court RTM Company Limited
- years
(vii) Service charge year to 27/08/2020: rent £8,540
- outcome
the proceedings are therefore struck out pursuant to Rule 9(2)(a)
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.