K Building, 43-45 East Smithfield, London E1W 1AP
LON/00BG/LDC/2023/0279 · dispensation from consultation · Tower Hamlets · decided 23 Jan 2024
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for further roof works to the ground floor commercial premises at K Building, without deciding whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | K Building Management Co Ltd |
| Management company | K Building Management Co Ltd |
| Managing agent | Hurford Salvi Carr Property Management Ltd |
| Building | A block, 14 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a block containing 14 flats on 5 floors
- freeholder
Applicant : K Building Management Co Ltd
- agent
Representative : Hurford Salvi Carr Property Management Ltd
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the Applicant dispensation under section 20ZA of the
- s20
The Tribunal grants the Applicant dispensation under section 20ZA of the
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.