Jasmine Way, Bexhill On Sea, East Sussex, TN39 3GJ
CHI/21UG/LDC/2024/0008 · dispensation from consultation · Rother · decided 11 Mar 2024
The tribunal retrospectively dispensed with the section 20 consultation requirements for additional stone pillar works at Jasmine Way, on condition that the applicant sends the decision to all leaseholders and confirms this to the tribunal within 7 days, but it did not decide whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Jasmine Way RTM Company Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | An estate, 29 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
five of which form part of the RTM Company and contain 29 flats
- freeholder
Applicant : Jasmine Way RTM Company Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal grants an order retrospectively dispensing with
- s20
The Tribunal grants an order retrospectively dispensing with
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.