Jamestown Harbour Estate, London, E14
LON/00BG/LSC/2018/0390 · service charges · Camden · decided 2 Sep 2019
The tribunal decided that the cost of installing electronic gates at the Jamestown Harbour estate is recoverable under the leases and that the need for and cost of the gates were reasonable.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Chime Properties Limited |
| Management company | Mulberry Management Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | An estate, 53 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
53 leasehold flats and 20 freehold houses located within three
- freeholder
The freeholder of Bridge House Quay and Lancaster Drive is Chime Properties Limited.
- management company
Applicant/Claimant : Mulberry Management Limited
- outcome
the need and cost of installing the gates was reasonable under section
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.