Ivor Court, Gloucester Place, London, NW1 6BJ
LON/00BK/LSC/2017/0296 · service charges · Westminster · decided 21 Sep 2020
No plain-English summary for this decision yet. See the original.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made (from the later costs ruling on this case, linked below) |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Ivor Court Freehold Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works, repairs and maintenance, legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | major works |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | £4,760.80 |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to pay £1,750 for expert attendance and 20% of the applicant's reasonable hearing costs (summarily assess |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : Ivor Court Freehold Limited
- outcome
Mr [name] is ordered to pay to the applicant:
- total payable
The total sum payable by him is therefore £4,760.80 which should be paid by him to the Applicant
- costs
The total sum payable by him is therefore £4,760.80 which should be paid by him to the Applicant
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
Later rulings on the same case (costs, section 20C, permission to appeal): 9 Jul 2021.
This decision replaces an earlier one for the same case: 8 Jan 2019, 15 Apr 2019.
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.