Island Apartments, Coleman Fields, London N1 8PW
LON/00AU/LDC/2021/0006 · dispensation from consultation · Islington · decided 6 Apr 2022
The tribunal allowed the applicant's request to dispense with the Section 20 consultation requirements for fire safety works to remedy cladding defects identified in the EWS1 report, provided the works fall under the landlord's obligations in the leases, while leaseholders keep their right to challenge the reasonableness of costs.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Island Islington Residents Management Company Ltd |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 82 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprises 82 self-contained flats
- management company
Applicant : [name] Management Company Ltd
- outcome
The Tribunal determines to allow this application to dispense with the consultation requirements imposed by Section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The Tribunal determines to allow this application to dispense with the consultation requirements imposed by Section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.