Ink Court, 419 Wick Lane London E3 2PW
LON/00BG/LDC/2021/0236 · dispensation from consultation · Tower Hamlets · decided 17 Nov 2021
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for major fire-safety works to the external wall cladding and balcony decking, subject to the landlord answering questions from a leaseholder within 28 days.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 112 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a seven- storey purpose- built residential building comprising 112 residential units and three commercial units.
- outcome
The tribunal grants dispensation in respect of the major works relating to the external wall cladding and balcony decking identified as required in the fire engineering report prepared by Design Fire Consultants on 10 November 2020.
- s20
The tribunal grants dispensation in respect of the major works relating to the external wall cladding and balcony decking
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.