Imperial Heights, 105 Lilliput Road, Canford Cliffs, Poole, BH14 8JY
CHI/00HP/LDC/2024/0117 · dispensation from consultation · Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole · decided 14 Aug 2024
The tribunal granted the landlord company dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for entering a new electricity supply contract from 1 January 2025, without deciding whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Imperial Heights (Canford Cliffs) Management Limited |
| Managing agent | Foxes Property Management Ltd |
| Building | A block, 8 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The building is a purpose bulit block of 8 flats
- agent
The Compnay has also appointed managing agents Foxes Property Management Ltd
- outcome
The Applicant is granted dispensation under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The Applicant is granted dispensation under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 from the consultation requirements
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.