Homedane House, Denmark Place, Hastings, East Sussex, TN34 1PQ
HAV/21UD/LDC/2025/0699 · dispensation from consultation · Hastings · decided 14 Oct 2025
The tribunal granted the RTM company dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent works to replace the warden call system at Homedane House, without deciding whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Homedane House RTM Company Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | AM Surveying & Block Management |
| Building | A block, 48 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Homedane House is a block of 48 retirement flats
- freeholder
Applicant : Homedane House RTM Company Ltd
- agent
Representative : AM Surveying & Block Management
- outcome
The Applicant is granted dispensation under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 from the consultation requirements
- s20
The Tribunal consequently finds that it is reasonable to dispense with all of the formal consultation requirements in respect of the major works to the building
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.