Holywell Heights, Sheffield S4 8AU
MAN/00CG/LDC/2025/0618 · dispensation from consultation · Sheffield · decided 12 Jan 2026
The Tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the s.20 consultation requirements for fire safety smoke ventilation window works at Holywell Heights, but made no decision on whether the charges are payable or reasonable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Holywell Heights Management Limited |
| Management company | Holywell Heights Management Limited |
| Managing agent | Trinity (Estates) Property Management Limited |
| Building | An estate |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2025 |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
The Applicant is Holywell Heights Management Limited, the management company for the Property.
- agent
[name] (Estates) Property Management Limited acts as the managing agent
- years
carried out in February 2025 at a total cost of £29,167.00 plus VAT.
- outcome
the Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of s.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
the Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of s.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.