Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near SE2 9DR

Hippersley Point, 4 Tilson Bright Square, Felixstowe Road, Abbey Wood, London SE2 9DR

LON/00AL/LDC/2021/0244 · dispensation from consultation · Greenwich · decided 20 Dec 2021

The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for the cladding remediation and interim fire safety works, on condition that it cannot recover its costs of the application from the leaseholders.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordAdriatic Land 5 Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 32 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputemajor works, other
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderedthe applicant is prohibited from seeking its costs of the application from the leaseholders

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
32 residential apartments above
freeholder
Adriatic Land 5 Limited
outcome
The application for dispensation is approved.
s20
The application for dispensation is approved.
costs
the Applicants are prohibited from seeking their costs of this application from the leaseholders at Hippersley Point

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.