Hilton House, 17 St Johns Road, Bournemouth, BH5 1EQ
CHI/00HN/LIS/2019/0046 · LIS · Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole · decided 14 Nov 2019
The Tribunal found the proposed external redecoration and repair works fall within the landlord's repairing obligations and that consultation was complied with, but it could not decide whether the charges are payable or reasonable because the works have not yet been carried out and no costs have been incurred or demanded.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Napier Management Services Limited |
| Building | A block, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019 |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
contains 6 flats divided over 3 floors
- agent
Representative : Napier Management Services Limited
- years
whether service charges are payable in 2019 for major works
- outcome
the Tribunal is not in a position to determine whether the charges are payable or reasonable because the costs of the works have not yet been incurred
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.