Headland Park House, 94 North Hill, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8EX
CHI/00HG/LDC/2022/0082 · dispensation from consultation · Plymouth · decided 28 Oct 2022
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent replacement of the fire alarm system, conditional on the decision and quotation being sent to all leaseholders.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Headland Park Developments Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Plymouth Block Management |
| Building | A block, 20 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
5-storey custom-built block of 20 flats with a commercial unit on the ground floor.
- freeholder
Applicant : Headland Park Developments Limited
- agent
Representative : Plymouth Block Management
- outcome
In my judgment it is just and equitable to grant dispensation to the Applicant for the fire alarm works.
- s20
In my judgment it is just and equitable to grant dispensation to the Applicant for the fire alarm works.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.