Harrogate House, 39 Parliament Street, Harrogate HG1 2BU
MAN/36UD/LDC/2020/0005 · dispensation from consultation · North Yorkshire · decided 27 Mar 2020
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent waking fire watch, alarm and smoke vent works at the building, leaving the reasonableness of the charges to be decided later.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Harrogate House (Maintenance) Limited |
| Management company | Harrogate House (Maintenance) Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 20 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
converted into 20 x 2 bedroom apartments during 2005
- management company
The Applicant is the Management Company, a party to the Leases of apartments at the Property.
- outcome
24. The Applicant is dispensed from complying with the consultation requirements in respect of the work specified in the application.
- s20
We conclude it reasonable in accordance with Section 20ZA(1) of the Act to dispense with the consultation requirements
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.