Harrods Village, Trinity Church Road, Barnes London SW13 8ES
LON/00BD/LDC/2019/0143 · dispensation from consultation · Richmond upon Thames · decided 15 Oct 2019
The tribunal granted the freeholder of a large estate dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent works to repair the leaking and damaged pipes of its district heating system.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | The Village Estate Management Company |
| Management company | The Village Estate Management Company |
| Managing agent | Rendall and Rittner Limited |
| Building | An estate, 247 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Applicant is the freeholder of a large estate comprising 247 units
- freeholder
The Applicant is the freeholder of a large estate
- agent
The property is managed on their behalf by Rendall and Rittner Limited Urban Owners.
- outcome
The Tribunal has determined that the Applicant shall be granted dispensation
- s20
the Applicant shall be granted dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.