Harrison House, 211 Westwood Road, Ilford, IG3 8SE
LON/00BC/LSC/2025/0826 · service charges · Redbridge · decided 5 May 2026
The tribunal found the 2024 interim service charge of £30,000 payable, the 2025 section 20 consultation lawful and the one-seventh apportionment correct, and made no order preventing the landlord recovering its costs through the service charge.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Harrison House Limited |
| Management company | B.Bailey Property Management Ltd |
| Managing agent | B.Bailey Property Management Ltd |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2024 |
| Items in dispute | legal and professional fees, major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | £30,000 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising seven similar units on a corner plat of land off
- freeholder
Applicant : Harrison House Limited
- agent
Present at the tribunal was Mr [name] FRICS of B. Bailey Property Management Ltd the representative of the freeholder.
- years
service charge years 2024
- outcome
The tribunal determines that the sum of £30,000 is payable by the
- total payable
The tribunal determines that the sum of £30,000 is payable by the
- s20c
The tribunal does not make an order under section 20C of the Landlord
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.