HARLEQUIN COURT 234 PAMPISFORD ROAD CROYDON CR2 6DB
LON/00AH/LDC/2025/0692 · dispensation from consultation · Croydon · decided 9 Sep 2025
The Tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for emergency works after the water supply failed, including pump replacement, tank leak repairs, a temporary water supply and pest control, finding the leaseholders had not shown relevant prejudice.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Southern Land Securities Ltd. |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 12 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The property comprises a purpose built block of 12 flats.
- freeholder
Applicant : Southern Land Securities Ltd.
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the statutory consultation requirements shall be dispensed with in respect of the following works
- s20
the statutory consultation requirements shall be dispensed with in respect of the following works
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.