Hannah Court, 106 Fox Lane, London N13 4AZ
LON/00AK/LDC/2023/0174 · dispensation from consultation · Enfield · decided 4 Oct 2023
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found that the leaseholder breached the private residence covenant in clause 10.1 and the sharing covenants in clause 11.4 and/or 11.5 by letting rooms to short-term paying guests via Airbnb, but found no breach of the nuisance covenants in clauses 10.2 and 13.4.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Canary Riverside Development PTE Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
made between Canary Riverside Development PTE Limited (1) and [name] (2)
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.