Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near SO31 4GB

Hamble Manor, Green Lane, Hamble le Rice, Southampton, SO31 4GB

HAV/24UD/LAM/2024/0605 · appointment of a manager · Eastleigh · decided 30 Sep 2025

The tribunal refused to appoint a manager for Hamble Manor: it found breaches of repairing and fire safety obligations, but decided that appointing a manager was not just and convenient at this stage, and that the proposed manager would not be suitable.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordHamble Green Management Limited
Management companyHamble Green Management Limited
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 6 flats
Service charge years in dispute2022, 2023
Items in disputeinsurance, management fees, major works, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities, legal and professional fees, administration charges
Items disallowed or reducedlegal and professional fees, administration charges
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
Respondent : Hamble Green Management Limited
agent
Representative : GH Property Management Services Ltd
outcome
It is not just and convenient to make an order under section 24(1) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.