Hailsham Court, Marina, Bexhill on Sea, East Sussex, TN40 1DL
HAV/21UG/LDC/2026/0039 · dispensation from consultation · Rother · decided 23 Apr 2026
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent replacement of the suspension ropes in the lifts at Hailsham Court, so the works could proceed without full consultation.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Hailsham Court Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Oakfield PM Limited |
| Building | A block, 10 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
purpose built brick building with 5 floors and 10 flats
- freeholder
Applicant : Hailsham Court Limited
- agent
Representative : Oakfield PM Limited
- outcome
dispensation is granted pursuant to section 20ZA of the 1985 Act.
- s20c
There is no application before the Tribunal
- s20
dispensation is granted pursuant to section 20ZA of the 1985 Act.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.