Haddenhurst Court, Terrace Road South, Binfield, Berkshire RG42 4BQ
CAM/00MA/LDC/2024/0608 · dispensation from consultation · Bracknell Forest · decided 12 Dec 2024
The Tribunal granted the landlord retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent roof repairs at Haddenhurst Court, so the works are not subject to full consultation, although leaseholders can still challenge the cost or reasonableness of the works under section 27A.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Churchill Retirement Living Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Churchill Estates Management Limited |
| Building | A block, 37 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The development consists of 37 flats.
- freeholder
Churchill Retirement Living Limited
- agent
Churchill Estates Management Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal is satisfied that it is reasonable to dispense with compliance with the consultation requirements
- s20
The Tribunal is satisfied that it is reasonable to dispense with compliance with the consultation requirements
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.