Ground floor flat, 14 Folkestone Road, London E17 9SD
LON/00BH/LBC/2020/0024 · breach of lease · Waltham Forest · decided 1 Feb 2021
The tribunal declined to grant a declaration of breach of covenant against the leaseholder, found none of the three alleged breaches substantiated, and ordered the applicant to pay £35,841 towards the respondent's legal costs.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance, repairs and maintenance, legal and professional fees, administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | insurance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to receive £35,841 contribution from the applicant towards legal costs under Rule 13 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- costs
the Tribunal orders the Applicant forthwith to pay to the Respondent the sum of £35,841 (thirty five thousand eight hundred and forty one pounds) by way of contribution to the Respondent's legal costs of defending this application.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.