Ground Floor Flat, 13 Richmond Wood Road, Bournemouth, Dorset BH8 9DG
CHI/00HN/LBC/2021/0003 · breach of lease · Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole · decided 14 May 2021
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the respondent in breach of the lease by keeping dogs without consent and by parking vehicles that obstructed access to the driveway, while the allegations about insurance premiums were withdrawn and the roof-quotes and building-items allegations were not made out.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance, major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that there has been a breach of paragraphs 9 and 10 of the Third Schedule of the lease.
- s20c
The Tribunal has not made any order for costs, either under Section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.