Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near BH8 9DG

Ground Floor Flat, 13 Richmond Wood Road, Bournemouth, Dorset BH8 9DG

CHI/00HN/LBC/2021/0003 · breach of lease · Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole · decided 14 May 2021

figures not yet checked

The tribunal found the respondent in breach of the lease by keeping dogs without consent and by parking vehicles that obstructed access to the driveway, while the allegations about insurance premiums were withdrawn and the roof-quotes and building-items allegations were not made out.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Refused
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingOne flat
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputeinsurance, major works
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

outcome
The Tribunal determines that there has been a breach of paragraphs 9 and 10 of the Third Schedule of the lease.
s20c
The Tribunal has not made any order for costs, either under Section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.