Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near W1T 6NU

Ground Floor and Basement, 104 Cleveland Street, London W1T 6NU

LON/00AG/LSC/2025/0923 · service charges · Camden · decided 3 Jun 2026

The tribunal decided that the respondent demanded a fair and reasonable proportion of the insurance rent and the clause 3.2 costs, but that the lease does not require the tenant to contribute to common parts costs, professional fees, or reserve funds.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not clear
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentHurford Salvi Carr Property Management Limited
BuildingOne flat
Service charge years in dispute2021
Items in disputeadministration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund
Items disallowed or reducedadministration charges, legal and professional fees, management fees, reserve fund
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
Respondent : 102/104 Cleveland Street Limited
agent
The current managing agents for the Building are Hurford Salvi Carr Property Management Limited (“HSC”).
years
In relation to the Insurance Rent for 2021-25, has the respondent demanded “a fair proportion” of the cost of insuring the Building
outcome
The tribunal determines that the respondent has demanded “a fair and reasonable proportion” of the costs listed at clause 3.2 of the lease.
items reduced
The tenant is liable to contribute to service charge categories which relate to the landlord’s obligation to keep in good repair

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.