Green View Court, School Mead, Abbots Langley, WD5 0FB
CAM/26UJ/LDC/2025/0650 · dispensation from consultation · Three Rivers · decided 17 Nov 2025
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent roof repairs at Green View Court, but leaseholders can still challenge the cost and reasonableness of the works.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Rockwell (FC100) Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Residential Management Group Ltd |
| Building | A block, 24 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant to bear its own costs of the application |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
24No. flats in all.
- freeholder
Landlord : [name] (FC100) Ltd
- agent
Residential Management Group Ltd
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the requirements on the applicant
- s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the requirements on the applicant
- costs
The applicant will meet all of its costs arising from the making and determination of this application.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.