Great Northern Tower , 1 Watson St, Manchester, M3 4EE
MAN/00BN/LDC/2021/0027 · dispensation from consultation · Manchester · decided 9 Mar 2022
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the s.20 consultation requirements for urgent fire safety work at Great Northern Tower, while stating this does not decide whether the resulting service charge is reasonable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Great Northern Tower Management Company Limited |
| Managing agent | JB Leitch Limited |
| Building | A block, 258 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising 258 residential apartments
- management company
Great Northern Tower Management Company Limited applies to the Tribunal
- agent
Representative : JB Leitch Limited
- outcome
The Applicant is dispensed from complying with the consultation requirements in respect of the work specified in the application.
- s20
we conclude it reasonable in accordance with Section 20ZA(1) of the Act to dispense with the consultation requirements
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.