Gloucester Square Gardens, London, W2 2TJ
LON/00BK/LLE/2021/0003 · LLE · Westminster · decided 21 Feb 2022
The tribunal decided that the Garden Rate for Gloucester Square Garden should be apportioned using a points-based method, backdated to 1 January 2021, rather than the existing rateable-value shares or the proposed unit charge or GEA methods.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Principia Estate and Asset Management |
| Building | A block, 91 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2016 |
| Items in dispute | other, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- agent
The Garden Committee have appointed managing agents to manage the Garden, namely Principia Estate and Asset Management (“Principia”)
- years
Chelwood ask for this to be backdated to 1 January 2016
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the Points Based method proposed by the Active Respondent should be used to apportion the Garden Rate
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.