Garden Flat, 25a Nassington Road, London NW3 2TX
LON/00AG/LSC/2020/0035 · service charges · Camden · decided 22 Sep 2020
The tribunal made no section 20C order and refused the respondent's application for costs against the applicant, after the applicant withdrew her service charge challenge.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2008 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, repairs and maintenance, cleaning and grounds, legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The respondent is the freeholder of 25 Nassington Road in Hampstead (‘the Block’), which contains four flats.
- years
It was agreed that service charges would be determined for the period 2008 to 2020 and the claim for later years was discontinued.
- outcome
The Tribunal makes no order on the application made under section 20C(1) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20c
The Tribunal makes no order on the application made under section 20C(1) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (‘the 1985 Act’).
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.