Garages at Plot 2 The Framptons Grange Rd, Netley Abbey, Southampton, SO31 5HZ
CHI/24UD/LBC/2024/0006 · breach of lease · Eastleigh · decided 12 Aug 2025
No plain-English summary for this decision yet. See the original.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance, legal and professional fees, administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondents to reimburse the applicant £750 costs order under rule 13(1)(b) and application and hearing fees |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- outcome
The respondents are in breach of Schedule 4 Paragraph 8.1 of the lease by installing an electric vehicle charging point to the exterior of the garage.
- s20c
The applications by the respondents for orders under section 20C of The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and Paragraph 5A, Schedule 11 of The Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 are refused.
- costs
The Tribunal orders that the respondents shall repay the applicant’s application and hearing fees within 28 days.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.