Fox Court, Greetland, Halifax, HX4 8EE
MAN/00CY/LDC/2025/0643 · dispensation from consultation · Calderdale · decided 8 Feb 2026
The tribunal dispensed unconditionally with the statutory consultation requirements for the already completed works to replace the support pillars for the front roofs at Fox Court, which cost £14,700 including VAT.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Places for People Homes Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Residential Management Group Limited |
| Building | A block, 20 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £14,700 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising of 20 houses / flats let on long leases
- freeholder
The Applicant is the freehold proprietor of the Property
- agent
Representative : [name] - Residential Management Group Limited
- outcome
makes a determination to dispense with the requirement to consult with the Respondents
- total demanded
at a cost of £14,700 including VAT
- s20
dispense with the requirement to consult with the Respondents
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.