Floral Court, Oakhill Road, Ashtead, Surrey KT21 2JL
CHI/43UE/LDC/2020/0097 · dispensation from consultation · Mole Valley · decided 22 Mar 2021
The Tribunal granted the applicant landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent roof repairs at Floral Court, without deciding whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Patrick Gardner Management Company Limited |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- management company
Representative : [name] Management Company Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of S.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 to repair the roof at Floral Court
- s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of S.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 to repair the roof at Floral Court.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.