Flats at The Arthaus Apartments, 205 Richmond Road, London, E8 3FF
LON/00AM/LSC/2019/0006 · service charges · Hackney · decided 29 Jul 2019
The tribunal found most 2014 to 2017 service charges payable but reduced the 2016 and 2017 concierge costs and the 2016 and 2017 common parts cleaning costs, and refused a section 20C order.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Hazlewood Properties Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 70 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | cleaning and grounds, other |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
There were originally 68 private flats but there are now 70.
- freeholder
Respondent : Hazlewood Properties Limited
- years
all the service charges claimed for 2014-2017
- outcome
(a) The total cost for concierge services for 2016 shall be reduced from
- items reduced
The total cost for common parts cleaning services for 2016 shall be
- s20c
The Tribunal declines to make an order under section 20C of the Landlord
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.