Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near MK41 7PP

Flats A-H, 32 Clapham Road, Bedford MK41 7PP

CAM/00KB/LDC/2024/0005 · dispensation from consultation · Bedford · decided 22 Apr 2024

The Tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for emergency roof dormer repairs at 32 Clapham Road, finding the works urgent and no prejudice to leaseholders; the cost itself remains open to a later challenge.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not clear
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordClapham Road Freehold Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingOne flat, 8 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
being 8 separate flats within a converted and extended house
freeholder
Applicant : Clapham Road Freehold Limited
outcome
The Tribunal determines under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 to dispense with the consultation requirements in respect of emergency repair works to the roof dormers at the Property.
s20
dispensation is granted pursuant to section 20ZA of the 1985 Act.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.