Flats A - F Springbank, 90 Fishergate Hill, Preston, PR1 8PL
MAN/30UK/LDC/2024/0029 · dispensation from consultation · Preston · decided 28 Mar 2025
The tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent fire-safety works to the electrical cupboard door at Springbank, finding it reasonable because the works were necessary and urgent and the leaseholders had not suffered real prejudice.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Places for People Homes Ltd. |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Residential Management Group Ltd |
| Building | A block, 12 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £2,715 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
one of two separate three-storey blocks of 12 flats
- freeholder
Applicant : [name] for People Homes Ltd.
- outcome
Compliance with the consultation requirements of s.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 is dispensed with
- total demanded
The cost of the works was £2,715.00 exclusive of VAT.
- s20
Compliance with the consultation requirements of s.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 is dispensed with
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.