Flats A and B, 62 Aubert Park, London N5 1TS
LON/00AU/LSC/2019/0223 · service charges · Islington · decided 3 Oct 2019
The Tribunal decided it had no jurisdiction to determine the leaseholders' challenge to roof terrace work charges because the respondent had no standing to demand service charges and no compliant demands were served.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | 62 Aubert Park Management Company Limited |
| Management company | 62 Aubert Park Management Company Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 3 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019 |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
the small three flat building
- freeholder
The freehold interest is held by 62 Aubert Park Management Company Limited
- management company
Although the Management Company was a party to the Application
- years
in respect of the year 2019
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that it has no jurisdiction in relation to this matter.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.