Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near W12 0JJ

Flats A, 2, C, 12 Adelaide Grove, London, W12 0JJ

LON/00AN/LDC/2021/0093 · dispensation from consultation · Hammersmith and Fulham · decided 16 Aug 2021

The tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements, without conditions, for urgent repairs to a burst waste pipe at 12 Adelaide Grove.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedRTM company
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management company12 Adelaide Grove, RTM Company Limited
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 3 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
the three flats in a converted house at 12 Adelaide Grove
management company
12 Adelaide Grove, RTM Company Limited (“the applicant”)
outcome
The Tribunal grants this application to dispense with the consultation
s20
The Tribunal grants this application to dispense with the consultation requirements imposed by section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 without condition in respect of works to repair a broken waste pipe.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.