Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near RG14 7EZ

Flats 77 and 115 Jago Court, Newbury, Berkshire RG14 7EZ

CAM/00MB/LIS/2021/0027 · LIS · West Berkshire · decided 7 Jun 2022

figures not yet checked

The tribunal found the leaseholders liable for £8,862 of service charges for the roof replacement works, granted dispensation for the s.20 notices sent by email, and made no section 20C order.

OutcomePayable as demanded
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Refused
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companyAlbion Place (Newbury) Management Company Limited
Managing agentHenwick Properties
BuildingA block, 9 flats
Service charge years in dispute2017
Items in disputemajor works
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

management company
Albion Place (Newbury) Management Company Limited was represented by Mr [name] of counsel
agent
Mr [name] of Henwick Properties, the managing agents
outcome
we find that the Respondents are indebted to the Applicant/Claimant in the sum of £8,862
s20c
We make no order under section 20C of the Act
s20
In this regard we find the dispensation should be granted.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.