Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near SW1P 1HG

Flats 71, 76A, 82A, 83A, 83B & 83C, Block 6 Ashley Gardens, Thirleby Road, London SW1P 1HG

LON/00BK/LSC/2020/0078 · service charges · Westminster · decided 26 Aug 2020

The tribunal found most disputed 2017-2020 charges payable, but disallowed several items including company administration costs and unexplained invoices, reduced the 2019-20 legal fees estimate to £25,000 and window cleaning estimate to £600, and limited the landlord's section 20C costs to 70%.

OutcomeReduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Order made
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 19 flats
Service charge years in dispute2017, 2018, 2019
Items in disputeadministration charges, insurance, legal and professional fees, other, repairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducedadministration charges, legal and professional fees, other
Total demanded£46,697.39
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
The Property consists of 19 flats held on long leases.
freeholder
Respondent : [name] 6 Ashley Gardens Limited
years
seeks to challenge various items of service charge in respect of the years 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2019-20.
outcome
Service charge items 4, 5, 11, 12, 13, 18, 19, 22, 24, 25 & 27 (as identified in Appendix 1) are not payable and/or unreasonable.
items reduced
Service charge items 4, 5, 11, 12, 13, 18, 19, 22, 24, 25 & 27 (as identified in Appendix 1) are not payable and/or unreasonable.
total demanded
TOTAL: £46,697.39
s20c
The Tribunal makes an Order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 that no more than 70% of the costs incurred by the Respondent in connection with these proceedings are to be regarded as relevant costs

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.